Thoughts on the design of tomorrow’s buildings : energy efficient, high performance buildings

Agricultural technical institutes have combined their efforts within a Combined Technological Network (CTN) « Farm buildings of the future » to offer ideas for these  buildings. Altough it may be difficult to imagine how fast the expectations of the farming world and society will evolve over the next few years, buildings are not just a question of materials used, and they will become the object of the questions which arise today. Tomorrow’s buildings will be the result of compromise between investment and profitability, work and safety, animal well-being and productivity, environment and energy-saving. Here are some thoughts with regard to energy efficient, high performance buildings for the equine sector….

1

prototype bâtiment économe et performant
Table of contents

What is the combined Technological network « husbandry buildings of the future » ?

The Combined technological network (CNT) « Husbandry buildins of the futeur » has developed a wide network of competencies and exchanges on husbandry buildings (horses, pigs, ruminants and poultry). It promotes the emergence of projects between the actors of research, development, and teaching. Between 2014 and 2018, one of the aims of the network was to design and build virtual buildings for each of the sectors.

For further information regarding this network, its objectives and actors: http://www.rmt-batiments.org/

Virtual building prototypes

Each prototype put forward is optimized with regard to one of the following 3 priorities :

  • The energy efficient, high performance building : priority « well-reasoned costs » to manage the overheads linked to the building.
  • The eco-responsible building : priority « environment » to minimize the environmental impact of the building.
  • The precision building : priority « precision » to integrate new cutting-edge technologies

Thus each prototype offers a range of technical solutions optimised with regard to the the priority aimed for, and the type of husbandry adopted. They are therefore not considered as THE only reference for what might be the buildings of the future. The prototypes will necessarily give rise to reactions of support or to constructive criticism. They do not propose a complete break from existing types of building, but rather offer the highest optimisation possible.

Each and every farmer will find sources to be adapted to his particular situation. In fact, the final choices remain with project promoters to build and equip buildings to suit the needs of their farm and their aspirations.

Energy efficient, high performance buildings : the prototype presented by the IFCE

The general aims of the prototype are to control investment and operation expenses linked to the buildings, and to channel the farming management towards less time spent inside the buildings.

The prototype is based on a husbandry system in maxi pastures, with a winter period spent on outdoor stabilised surfaces, including exercise , resting and feeding areas.

Building design around 4 main axes

Aim 1 : improving the horses living conditions

The accomodation mode corresponds to an outdoor collective system of accomodation to promote social relationships and animal well-being. The system offers permanent access to hay which favours digestive health and prevents build-up of dust on the feeding areas. A scratching area, and a rolling area also contribute to the horses’ comfort.

Aim 2 : minimize building costs

Aire de couchage avec lanières PVC sur les côtés
Lying down area with PVC strips on the sides © IFCE
Covered surfaces are limited, and only cover the feeding and rest areas. The rest area uses straw bedding providing a minimum of 10m2 per horse (reminder : the minimal lie-down surface for a horse = (1,7 x height at withers in m)2). The feeding area is a linear free-access facade with an awning of 2,10m in height. The cladding on the sides are replaced by PVC strips which serve as windbreakers and an escape route in the case of a conflict. The height of the building is kept down to the height of the vehicles, i.e. 3,50m


Aim 3 : mechanising, automating and making safe the different tasks

râtelier avec grille inclinée relevable et store enrouleur électrique
Râtelier avec grille inclinée relevable et store enrouleur électrique © IFCE
Hay distribution has been mechanised and is carried out from the outside. The hay bales rest on a sloping liftable grid which allows the hay to continuously slide down, and reduces dust. It can be lifted up to make cleaning easier (system which has not yet been tested). The hay is protected from the wind by an electric roller blind on the side facing outwards.

Mucking out is also made easier by stabilising the ground which allows the use of a scraper to remove the droppings, and could also allow the use of a robotic automatic scraper (prototype yet to be designed). The accumulated manure in the rest area is held back by beams to restrict maintenance in the area.


Barre d’échographie
Stock for ultrasound examinations © IFCE
Access to the pastures is controlled via an automatic programmable gate. In the same way the stock for ultrasound scans is fitted with two automatic gates activated by the user to sort the mares immediately after the scan.


Aim 4 : optimising manageùment of sewage, water and energy

The sewage is collected via drains and then treated using vegetated filtering gravel packs. Rain water is collected, filtered and used as drinking water for the horses (a study on the potability is forthcoming). Photovoltaic solar panels provide light for the mares, electricity for the electric fencing and for the various equipment.


Estimation of the investment costs (ex VAT)

BuildingStabilised areaLinear hay rack
130-150 €/m212-15 €/m2450-500 €/place

Strengths and weaknesses ?

StrengthsWeaknesses
  • Reduction of labour with collective management of the animals
  • Reduction of time-consuming tasks
  • Feeding system which respects horses’ physiological needs
  • Collective accomodation in accordance with the  liberties defined by Welfare Quality®
  • Difficulty in coping with care for « at risk » individuals (chronic diseases, old age….)
  • Compromise between abrasiveness of stabilised ground and ease of mucking out
  • Difficulty in coping with herds which are not stable over time

Know more about our authors
  • Thierry LEBORGNE Architecte, responsable du service Innovation Des Équipements Équestres (IDEE) de l'IFCE
  • Translated from french by : Karen DUFFY Translator
  • Pauline DOLIGEZ Development engineer IFCE
  • Laetitia LE MASNE Development engineer IFCE
  • Laurie BRIOT Research engineer IFCE
  • Camille THOMAS Apprentie ingénieur, chargée de projet « Bâtiments innovants » - IFCE
  • Laurent VIGNAUD Development and project engineer IFCE

Bibliography

To find this document: www.equipedia.ifce.fr/en
Editing date: 20 05 2024

Was this information sheet useful ?